Posted by: philsteele | August 27, 2010

Let’s celebrate children’s non-fiction!

Let’s celebrate non-fiction!

Here’s a date for your diaries: Thursday 4th November 2010.  That is to be the first-ever National Non-Fiction Day, set up by the Federation of Children’s Books Groups in conjunction with Scholastic. Let’s hope it turns out to be more than a promotional event for a single publisher, and that it evolves into an annual fixture with wide support from all publishers, bookshops, schools and libraries. This certainly  seems like a good idea, and is long overdue.

It has always seemed strange to identify a genre of writing by what it  is not. When promoting children’s non-fiction, that negative poses a bit of problem.   The Welsh term, llyfrau ffeithiol (‘factual books’) is hardly more inspiring.  During the cultural revolution  that swept through children’s non-fiction from the late 1960s  through to the 1980s and 90s, we all tried to think of more positive ways of describing  ‘topic books ‘ or ‘information books’. Every series title tried to emphasise child-based activity: discovering, finding out, looking up, stepping into. We’ve rather run out of the clichés by now. In fact many fellow writers feel that the steam is running out of ‘CN-F’ (ych a fi, the acronym is even worse) altogether. Amongst the 90 or so correspondents of the Nibweb e-mail forum (Network for Information Book Writers and Editors in Britain http://www.nibweb.co.uk/ ) there is considerable anxiety.

The malaise is  due to a wide range of factors.  Obviously the recent crises of capitalism have taken their toll.  Booksellers are vanishing from the high streets. Profits are poor  for publishers in this field. For many packagers (the small independent producers who sell on to publishers), margins and cash-flow are looking critical. For writers this means fewer jobs. Our pay has always been poor, generally in the form of flat fees and enforced signing away of copyright. Our traditional solution was to write more and work longer hours. The word ‘prolific’,  applied rather sniffily by many reviewers, simply refers to a writer who can sometimes pay the electricity bill. However for many of us the option of writing more is vanishing, and the impending cuts in libraries and schools bode ill.

Another problem might be the publishers themselves. Large international corporations have replaced smaller, more energetic companies.  Accountants and risk-averse sales departments now have precedence over the breed of editorially minded visionaries and entrepreneurs who created that revolution of 40 years ago. Publishers’ lists imitate each other and are straitjacketed by the lowest common denominators of international educational curricula.

Of course it is a new revolution, the electronic one, which really haunts our dreams and fears. Will  paper non-fiction go the way of typewriter manufacture and film processing as jobs of yesteryear?  The internet is a truly wonderful beast, we all know that in our heart of hearts.  However book publishers still have to find a way of coming to terms with it,  either as competitors or by entering cyberspace themselves and making money. I think cyberspace needs them, as much as they need it. The potential of the web as a learning tool has yet to be fulfilled.  Some children’s information websites are excellent, and their technology can be exciting, but the majority are badly written, poorly researched, appallingly designed and illustrated. Amateur stuff.

So, for now let’s sing the praises of children’s non-fiction of the paper variety.  It is a joy to plan, visualise and  write these books, whether they are destined to be international coeditions, general trade  books or topic books for schools and libraries. This writing is creative: it has its own stories to tell.  It is also apparently the preferred reading matter of boys, as opposed to girls. Why? Well there’s another blog to be had there, to be sure.

Support NNF Day  – http://nnfd.org/ – in whatever ways you can.  Ask in your local store why there are so few shelves devoted to ‘children’s reference.’ Campaign against library cuts.  When primary classes are taught how to find the right websites, demand that they are also told how to find the right books. And if you can think of a better term for children’s non-fiction, do let us know.

Hwyl fawr!



Responses

  1. it’s so important that children don’t lose the skill of reading non-fiction. Many students don’t bother reading whole books any more, preferring just to scan, or google, for a few necessary facts. But that’s not how you acquire real, deep knowledge. Do keep up the good work, Philip. Children need you and your books

  2. In reference books the structure is (well, should be!) carefully developed in a logical and thorough sequence. The website format is full of snippets of information, with links encouraging tangential diversions at any point. This has some value, but is a flawed approach to serious learning, in my view, and will inevitably have a knock-on effect on the ability of young people to write or structure essays. (He says grumpily on a beautiful bank holiday morning!)

  3. Thanks for this post, so good to hear support for the poor relation of children’s publishing. Non-fiction books should be as engaging and page-turning as any story. Just because we’re working with facts doesn’t make us less creative (she said, having just had to wrestle with how to make a page on sea defences fascinating) Did I succeed? I do hope so! Onwards and upwards….


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: